*disclaimer : the views expressed here are entirely mine with no influence from anyone.. and with no intention to hurt anyone's sentiments, feelings or sentimental feelings (combined)even.. just exercising my freedom of expression*
food.. that's the basic need.. and well, there are in fact all the world differences in that very base.. this by-gone's Saturday's Times Of India Crest edition, carried an article that glorified blood in food.. to the extent that it was almost termed as a part of a delicacy.. and quite rightfully so, because the pictures definitely looked appetizing to the senses.. speaking for myself, just by looking at 'em pictures and not reading the article or the what-n-where abouts of the pictures, i was tempted.. definitely.. almost instantly made a list of the new foods that i have to try..
and i'm saying this just to bring to the forth that there exists a varied mix of people.. and so, there definitely exists an equally, if not more, varied mix of the food.. so, just because, something doesn't fall into your list of edibles or if i can put it this way, permissible edibles, it definitely doesn't earn you the right of condemning those..
and what sparked this chain of thought in me, is a post by an acquaintance of mine from school.. if a specific animal is a staple in someone's diet, then you have no right to say or even practice the thought that killing of that specific animal (for food) should be made punishable by law.. because, if you're trying to give me the crap about "the animal is a living creature and you're killing it, hurting it", then i have to say, that it gives me the full right to the equal crap about "plants are living beings as well.. so you are also killing them and hurting them".
all i am saying, is, its high time that you let go of your stupid hypocritical philosophy about life in general and start by having at least a nominal respect about everything around you, that doesn't concern you..
and as far as the animal in question is concerned, you deprive its offspring of its very birth-right!
food for thought, for you now, maybe?
food.. that's the basic need.. and well, there are in fact all the world differences in that very base.. this by-gone's Saturday's Times Of India Crest edition, carried an article that glorified blood in food.. to the extent that it was almost termed as a part of a delicacy.. and quite rightfully so, because the pictures definitely looked appetizing to the senses.. speaking for myself, just by looking at 'em pictures and not reading the article or the what-n-where abouts of the pictures, i was tempted.. definitely.. almost instantly made a list of the new foods that i have to try..
and i'm saying this just to bring to the forth that there exists a varied mix of people.. and so, there definitely exists an equally, if not more, varied mix of the food.. so, just because, something doesn't fall into your list of edibles or if i can put it this way, permissible edibles, it definitely doesn't earn you the right of condemning those..
and what sparked this chain of thought in me, is a post by an acquaintance of mine from school.. if a specific animal is a staple in someone's diet, then you have no right to say or even practice the thought that killing of that specific animal (for food) should be made punishable by law.. because, if you're trying to give me the crap about "the animal is a living creature and you're killing it, hurting it", then i have to say, that it gives me the full right to the equal crap about "plants are living beings as well.. so you are also killing them and hurting them".
all i am saying, is, its high time that you let go of your stupid hypocritical philosophy about life in general and start by having at least a nominal respect about everything around you, that doesn't concern you..
and as far as the animal in question is concerned, you deprive its offspring of its very birth-right!
food for thought, for you now, maybe?
No comments:
Post a Comment